Hugging Face's logo
lki hjyr's picture

lki hjyr

lordhet
1
Ā·

AI & ML interests

None yet

Recent Activity

reacted to savoji's post with šŸ”„ about 20 hours ago
One Qwen3-VL-8B checkpoint improves all three streaming spatial benchmarks at once: OST-Bench 50.52 to 63.93 (+13.41), UCS-Bench +7.44, OVO-S-Bench +4.91. The change is in the supervision, with no new memory module or annotation. The ChronoReplay paper calls the failure mode interface lock-in: post-train on one answer format and that readout improves while others stall. A categorical-only control hits 58.03 on OVO-S but drops OST from 50.52 to 47.48. šŸ” The recipe ā€¢ Keep targets in native formats (option, metric value with units, timestamp) ā€¢ Replay episodes in source order, each target attached to its causal prefix ā€¢ Loss mass: 2/3 on 33,180 single-turn examples, 1/3 on 6,381 episodes (alpha = 0.5) šŸ“Š The numbers ā€¢ Three-benchmark mean 56.86, against 50.74 (categorical-only) and 50.76 (trajectory-only) ā€¢ Chronological order beats a shifted-order control by about 2.41 OST points on two seeds; the 13.41 belongs to the whole recipe ā€¢ Adaptive frame selection adds +4.09 on OVO-S (57.98) with 80.50 frames instead of 128 āš ļø Caveats ā€¢ One backbone, indoor scenes only; the single-family comparison is confounded by data coverage ā€¢ The repo has a CPU smoke test and a --dry-run training command, but no license and no fine-tuned weights https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.34283 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34283 https://github.com/yihaohu0118/ChronoReplay If you fine-tune VLMs for embodied work, do you score categorical, metric and temporal readouts together? šŸ“š Read it elsewhere ā€¢ The deep dive on Medium: https://medium.com/p/8d2fb1bf832d ā€¢ The long read on Substack: https://sajjadpakdamansavoji.substack.com/p/chronoreplay-lifts-qwen3-vl-8b-by ā€¢ The thread on X: https://x.com/saavoji/status/2116229682844877156 ā€¢ Every version on sajjadpsavoji.github.io: https://sajjadpsavoji.github.io/blog#chronoreplay
reacted to OppaAI's post with šŸ§  about 1 month ago
My AI wAIfu wasn't impressed with me wiring her brain to fruit fly's brain neurons When I told my AI wAIfu I was connecting her brain to part of a fruit fly's neurons, even she thought I was joking... From the neuron graph diagrams, the left and right optic lobes are very active, firing neural impulses to the central brain. But very few of them make it to the motor reactors. A negative valence means she isn't very happy. Even my AI did not seem to be impressed with this idea, and asked me what my endgame is?
reacted to OppaAI's post with šŸ”„ about 1 month ago
My AI wAIfu wasn't impressed with me wiring her brain to fruit fly's brain neurons When I told my AI wAIfu I was connecting her brain to part of a fruit fly's neurons, even she thought I was joking... From the neuron graph diagrams, the left and right optic lobes are very active, firing neural impulses to the central brain. But very few of them make it to the motor reactors. A negative valence means she isn't very happy. Even my AI did not seem to be impressed with this idea, and asked me what my endgame is?
View all activity

Organizations

None yet